Live Action Mafia

David: could you keep an eye on dgrazian? I'm slightly suspicious of him for not being sufficiently active/pro-town
he's got work, so it might not mean much
but just in case...
me: Sure, I'll try.
(I only see him on Mondays, really.)
David: ok
/actually/ keeping tabs on him is super helpful, but I just meant keeping an eye on what he seems to be doing
whether or not he's participating in game
me: Ok.
David: whether or not his enemies are dying off
Sent at 12:34 PM on Wednesday
me: Also, an observation that's probably too late to matter: we shouldn't all have publicly revealed our rogue targets, right? (If the mafia have a list of the actual targets, and everyone tells the truth except the rogue, it'd tell them but not us who the rogue is.)
David: yeah, that
um
me: (Am I missing something? It seems like something more experienced players would know about if it's right.)
David: I'm not actually sure everyone told the truth
in particular I think some people didn't
me: Ok. I thought of this too late to lie; oh well.
David: idk really
we'll see how it goes
(I was actually trying to analyze that data for anything interseting)
e.g. there's exactly 1 cycle
with travis, aok, lilly, and me
I think everyone else points indirectly into the cycle
me: I was staring at it too, and decided there probably wasn't much useful in it.
David: I also added a list of people who aren't listed (one of whom I know is actually someone's target; said person is lying)
me: Hmm. If the only cycle has even length, actually, then it's bipartite. Maybe all the mafia are on one side?
David: hmm, interesting
they couldn't know that for the rogues?
...maybe they could
they could probably name ~1/2 people alive who likely aren't rogues
...I need to draw that graph and see if people fit that category
*those categories
me: starts to do so too
Sent at 12:41 PM on Wednesday
David: ...this might not get us too far, though
because one criterion for them would be whether or not someone claimed rogue to them
which we don't really know
Sent at 12:43 PM on Wednesday
me: Right. Also, I don't think we have (at least, I don't have) much information about who the mafia would think is innocent.
Sent at 12:45 PM on Wednesday
David: yeah
i'll have to check with some people to see if they claimed rogue
...I guess I don't know for sure yet, but I doubt this is bipartate on {claimed rogue or is mafia}
me: It would make sense if she were just picking assignments without realizing that we'd get access to them.
That's an unrealistic assumption, but maybe the real graph is at least close?
I guess being just close is hardly any information, even if it's true.
Sent at 12:49 PM on Wednesday
David: possibly?
I think the mafia hat >1day to plan this though
me: *had
David: I need to go to class
ttyl
me: Cheerio!
Sent at 12:51 PM on Wednesday

This fits in with everything David has told me. Good to know, since he often has a habit of bluffing ("I know you were lying, and you were awake when the kill was made.").