I agree that sharing david as a target is a very weak indication at best, since the real rogue would probably have lied. But, with all due respect, you aren't someone we should trust in making that argument.
| Live Action Mafia http://mafia.mit.edu/ |
|
| Investigations for kaufmand http://mafia.mit.edu/viewtopic.php?f=306&t=1292 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Ellena [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Investigations for kaufmand |
Investigator B will be checking out tjhance (for lack of alibi) later today. |
|
| Author: | Lucy [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
we should probably wait for more alibis to come in/for the alibi committee to rank them (though that one is almost definitely staying white) |
|
| Author: | Ellena [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
B will wait until 6 and if no further info comes up, B will stay with tjhance. |
|
| Author: | Lucy [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
fair enough |
|
| Author: | kemus [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
Please see my "suspicions based on day 1 votes" thread. I think it's worth investigating dgrazian, toller, or miranda gavrin if their alibis are weak. Of these, toller has only NPs being able to confirm Daniel Grazian has no one able to confirm he was at work [Do you own a car, Dgrazian?] and Miranda Gavrin has not posted an alibi. I'd recommend investigating some subset of these, with my preferential ordering being 1- Miranda 2- Daniel 3- toller |
|
| Author: | aok [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
Slow down. Lots of people haven't posted an alibi yet. |
|
| Author: | kemus [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
aok wrote: Slow down. Lots of people haven't posted an alibi yet. On second thought, I am being a bit over-excited. Miranda just posted an alibi. I still think these people have some mild suspicion from me. |
|
| Author: | Miranda Gavrin [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
I have been and still am in my lab, thus the late alibi. I also feel like I should point out that I have a solid alibi for yesterday and today. I voted for qql because it was late and I didn't want to no lynch. |
|
| Author: | toller [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
I also voted for qql because I didn't want a no lynch day. And I feel like NPs are pretty trustworthy - they have no motivation to lie. Especially when there are multiple NPs. Which there have been, for all of my days. (PM me if you want contact info - I don't like sharing other people's contact info openly.) |
|
| Author: | achester [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
We should consider investigating aok for kaufmand's death: -He said he'd been assigned kaufmand as a rogue target. That's not worth much, but he could've thought when he posted his rogue target that lying would incriminate him. (Also applies to lopezv, but this isn't a strong enough reason by itself to be worth an investigation.) -An alibi committee consisting of one-third aok decided not to investigate kaufmand's death. (Also applies to kemus and Ellena, but also not suspicious on its own.) We've even got an investigation still unassigned; let's use it. |
|
| Author: | Ellena [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
I agree. Investigator C should check aok for kaufmand. |
|
| Author: | Miranda Gavrin [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
+1 to C investigating Aok for kaufmand. |
|
| Author: | kemus [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
Just to say aok's reasoning for not investigating kaufmand: His reasoning was along the lines of "the more investigation results we have on a murder, the more valuable each following investigation is, so splitting up the investigators is less useful" |
|
| Author: | lopezv [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
The fact that aok shared that david is his target makes it seem more likely to me that he isn't rogue (he could have easily lied since katie probably let the mafia know the actual assignments). I would prefer to investigate Ellena or kemus since it seems that they are equally suspicious. I'd prefer Ellena over Kemus. |
|
| Author: | achester [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
I agree that sharing david as a target is a very weak indication at best, since the real rogue would probably have lied. But, with all due respect, you aren't someone we should trust in making that argument.
|
|
| Author: | Ellena [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
Objectively, I would agree that investigating kemus or me is a good idea. We've confirmed each other's alibis a few times now, and beside that confirmation they haven't been particularly strong alibis, so going based on investigating weak alibis, I agree. However, it would be suspicious for a mafia pair to always use the same person over and over again for alibi confirmation. Also, ksedlar tried to frame me for isaacg's kill, which would imply me being town aligned. So if the only motivation for investigating one of us two is our weak alibis or our mutual confirmation, I think aok is an equally good target. |
|
| Author: | lopezv [ Wed Mar 05, 2014 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Investigations for kaufmand |
My investigator says aok did not kill David. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|