Live Action Mafia

Here is the vote I would advocate:
If no deaths happen tonight after jk, lynch aok.
If another death happens tonight after jk, no lynch.

Can we please not No Lynch. Town gains nothing from this. I'll go back to advocating tjhance if another kill happens.

If no one dies tonight, lynch aok. If someone does, no lynch.

Nevermind, I actually want to lynch aok either way. The mafia can use scheme and make another kill even if aok used it on jk, and that is exactly the type of thing aok would do as mafia.

Why am I now suspicious?

(I assumed the previous suspicion on me (that I didn't have a good alibi last night) on me was lifted after it was revealed that jk was the killer yesterday.)

If another kill happens tonight, we have no evidence other than based on the events of that kill, because day 1 was definitely done by jk. (2 investigations.)

You were just a random inactive (or I thought you were inactive anyway). I'll happily lynch mob anyone over No Lynch, but optimal targets are inactives, preferably non-new players.

++Justin

I'm totally for lynching aok either way.

Don't lynch aok tonight if another kill happens, because then he is definitely a prophet, because the mafia cannot kill two people today. Tjhance is not inactive, he came to the meeting on pecker tonight.

I'm also not non-new.

Hang on, never mind, if it was a mafia on mafia killing, it would have been done with set-a-trap, and he could still be guilty. Kill him regardless.

[quote="isaacg"]Don't lynch aok tonight if another kill happens, because then he is definitely a prophet, because the mafia cannot kill two people today. [/quote]
False. Scheme is a thing.

[quote="isaacg"]Don't lynch aok tonight if another kill happens, because then he is definitely a prophet, because the mafia cannot kill two people today. Tjhance is not inactive, he came to the meeting on pecker tonight.[/quote]

Mafia has a once-per-game ability that lets them kill 2 people in one day (see 'scheme' in the rules), and I guarantee aok would use it as mafia in this situation if he thought he would get away with it.

tj: yeah at the time you also didn't have an alibi so it overrode the non-new part. In any case it's moot now since I'm advocating lynching aok no matter what happens tonight.

Changing my vote to lynching aok no matter what.

changing my vote to lynch aok no matter what.

Also shovel aok afterwards if that wasn't obvious.

Time for AOK to die.

Unless something changes in the next 30 minutes, I'm going to vote to lynch aok. The whole aok prophets jk seems like a convoluted plot.

Proposal for shovel use:

Have a shovel holder publicly announce they have a shovel. An Innocent Child should then use their power on the shovel holder and receive the shovel. IC then uses shovel themselves and uses the original shovel holder as a mouthpiece.

If the shovel holder is mafia it seems really hard to abuse this. The hardest part would be limiting IC reveals to preferably 1.

Doesn't the IC die if he reveals to the shovel holder and the shovel holder happens to be mafia? Anyways, now that we've publicly announced our intention to shovel aok, the mafia will probably use plant evidence so that won't be very useful. It doesn't seem worth it to burn an IC over this.

I've talked to a shovel-holder who is prepared to do the shoveling. Nobody else use your shovels!

I disagree about innocent child revealing. The shovel is something that will be extremely risky for the mafia to lie about, and with little reward, so I'm not concerned about a mafia lying.

Relatedly, the shovel-user doesn't get any innocent-credit in my opinion, and I don't think any Innocent Children should reveal to them. Innocent Children should be very selective in who they reveal to.

I advocate lynching aok tonight. Does anyone disagree?