pravinas wrote:
Shouldn't it default to no vote? As in your vote has no weight for any potential candidates?
Why should it be that? I prefer the way I wrote the rules (so that there's an incentive to have everyone involved instead of just having only one player vote for the person we want lynched).
Also, in general principle I don't think rules should be changed mid-game unless there's a very good reason to do so, because people would tend to argue for the rules that benefit their alignment, and that's not how rules should work. E.g. if later in the game it seems like people are dying too fast I can't just say "I think we should reverse Josh's proposal for kill probabilities and go back to it always being 0.3," because even if it turns out that for some reason that would be a more fair rule, I'm also inherently biased toward wanting serial killers to get fewer kills, and the serial killers would be inherently biased toward wanting more kills.