| Live Action Mafia http://mafia.mit.edu/ |
|
| Discussion Day 3 http://mafia.mit.edu/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=763 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Daniel Grazian [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Discussion Day 3 |
Pretty certain we got one mafia there. |
|
| Author: | Elizabeth Krueger [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
== Dgrazian |
|
| Author: | Daniel Grazian [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Claim: I am superhero Proof: Lynch me tonight, and listen to the best political speech you've ever heard in your life. I was my own 'investigator' on Day 1. I got a negative on kaufmand. As a few people know, I was a bit anxious after having said that I was actually in contact with an investigator, because I was afraid that the mafia might guess that I made the investigation myself, since it was unlikely that someone would have confided in me as investigator so quickly after I made a public request for investigators to confide in me. But anyway, it doesn't matter now, because I'm coming out as Superhero. |
|
| Author: | AdamYedidia [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ah--forgive me, it looks like my vote for kaufmand was incorrect. In light of his later comments, and the fact that he did not make the first day's kill, he is now less likely to be mafia than a random other person, in my opinion. I suppose I'll lynch dgrazian today--I'm excited to hear his speech. |
|
| Author: | AdamYedidia [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ah--forgive me, it looks like my vote for kaufmand was incorrect. In light of his later comments, and the fact that he did not make the first day's kill, he is now less likely to be mafia than a random other person, in my opinion. I suppose I'll lynch dgrazian today--I'm excited to hear his speech. |
|
| Author: | Cathy Capalla [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I suggested this in an earlier post, but I want to be explicit: I am in contact with an investigator. My investigator did not make an investigation on Day 1, but on day 2 he/she got the result that schmolly killed Miranda. |
|
| Author: | Alex [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Daniel Grazian wrote: I was my own 'investigator' on Day 1. I got a negative on kaufmand. Could someone please point me to where this was announced? I must have missed it.
|
|
| Author: | Chewy Shaw [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Alex wrote: Daniel Grazian wrote: I was my own 'investigator' on Day 1. I got a negative on kaufmand. Could someone please point me to where this was announced? I must have missed it.Discussion Day 2, 11th post. |
|
| Author: | Josh Frisch [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Given that there are 5 and a half hours left in day, I think it's time to start the default lynch discussion. Who do we want to default lynch? |
|
| Author: | Molly K [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think we're default lynching dgrazian, backup if he is politician unknown. Nothing much has been happening in Random regarding mafia. |
|
| Author: | Josh Frisch [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
right, so either dgrazian is a crazy player (I don't think we have a suicidal alliance) or he should survive tonights lynch attempt (though, based on schmolly's apparent attempted attack on shi-ke last night I'm not convinced he WILL survive until tonight but that would change the status quo in any case) in which case the second place person WILL be the eventual lynch target. Given that its important that we treat whoever is in second place like we are lynching them, hence consider it now. |
|
| Author: | jk [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I would suggest lynching inactives. I think DeLong is one, although I don't remember if this is the case any more. |
|
| Author: | Josh Frisch [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
delong posted at least one message, I don't think he's posted more, obviously, given that I'm not on campus, I don't know how active he's been in discussions of game state which are live. |
|
| Author: | Daniel Grazian [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree on the lynch inactives strategy. Since nobody's suggested anybody specific, I'm going to suggest Matt Susskind. He's played in a couple of these games, and he's never done anything. And he hasn't made any posts at all this game. Make sure I get the most votes, though. That's even more critical than for shike yesterday, because I won't be politician tomorrow. |
|
| Author: | Daniel Grazian [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree on the lynch inactives strategy. Since nobody's suggested anybody specific, I'm going to suggest Matt Susskind. He's played in a couple of these games, and he's never done anything. And he hasn't made any posts at all this game. Make sure I get the most votes, though. That's even more critical than for shike yesterday, because I won't be politician tomorrow. |
|
| Author: | Molly K [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lynching inactives usually hits town players, but if they're not being active, it doesn't really make a difference? Could we have a list of who's been inactive this game? |
|
| Author: | Nathan [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Daniel Grazian wrote: I agree on the lynch inactives strategy.
Since nobody's suggested anybody specific, I'm going to suggest Matt Susskind. He's played in a couple of these games, and he's never done anything. And he hasn't made any posts at all this game. Make sure I get the most votes, though. That's even more critical than for shike yesterday, because I won't be politician tomorrow. I think this is pretty reasonable |
|
| Author: | aok [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
People who haven't voted: MattSusskind has been out of town for the last few days. kbeth has been sick. garywang Jenny not Jennifer (Miranda) (Fake ID 1) (Fake ID 3) |
|
| Author: | Molly K [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Considering that MattSusskind has been out of town, it seems more reasonable to vote for another inactive, but I could easily be convinced otherwise. |
|
| Author: | jk [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
So between garywang and Jenny Not Jennifer, the only difference is place of residence (both have microphones). It's reasonable that the other ET people will be able to poke garywang to make him an active. This would mean that Jenny should be inactive-lynched if we think Gary can be forced into activity. |
|
| Author: | Jenny Not Jennifer [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hmmmm, well I'd greatly prefer it if you guys don't lynch me, though I guess that's how everyone feels. I'm sorry that I haven't been voting like a good citizen, but I will try to be more active in the present/future. Starting now. Please don't lynch me. It'd probably wouldn't turn out well anyways. |
|
| Author: | jk [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yay! Disregard everything I have ever said. Could someone poke garywang with the threat of lynching? If he also shows up then we should probably no lynch because we would then be a loving happy family of actives with nothing to go off of. (Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!) |
|
| Author: | Elizabeth Krueger [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Are people meeting somewhere that I haven't heard about? It's like half an hour until voting deadline, and I haven't heard anything about people discussing things or a consensus on who we're lynching. |
|
| Author: | Cathy Capalla [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Gary's been going home at around 12 am lately, but he does check the forum. |
|
| Author: | Chewy Shaw [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Voting Gary now to be safe. |
|
| Author: | andrealincoln [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm going to vote for gary as well |
|
| Author: | andrealincoln [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Never mind: voting for Dgrazian |
|
| Author: | Josh Frisch [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
So my prefered vote is actually for Cathy (sorry for writing this so close to the deadline, I'd of thought there'd be consensus right now and I just finished dinner). The attack of kaufmand seems sketchy to me, even more so given that he apparently commited neither of the murders. In the argument she gave it felt like she was making a very strong claim, one which implied inside information. Given that, from what I can tell, we basicallly know that Schmolly was mafia and that she probably (unless there's something weird going on) commited the first two murders, one of which was on her floor. This feels like an attempt to deflect attention away from schmolly and onto a random person. Obviously I could be wrong about this and if I am, Cathy I'm sorry, but I think I'm going to vote to Lynch Cathy. |
|
| Author: | Alex [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Voting for Daniel Grazian. |
|
| Author: | Daniel Grazian [ Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh shit! This is why you don't do last minute lynch mobs. Gary is a good player and can easily be coaxed into activity (just checked; he's not around et right now.) |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|