Since this is a contentious point, I thought I'd compile the evidence for and against into one place for people to evaluate:
Points in favour: 3 first day kills (mafia + scheme +SK is possible though) A shovel showing swapnilg as a mafia vig (according to agu1) A seer claims clhong is a vig (reported by ixa)
Points Against: Investigator cc46 claims that {clhong, alexjli} -> swapnilg = clhong (Agu1 and I have both publicly claimed to be part of the proxy chain) Swapnilg supposedly claimed to clhong that he was an SK (seems too convenient. Saying I plead human should not reveal this info)
Any thoughts on any situations that can make all the evidence valid. Alternatively if not, it likely means that someone is lying, can we surmise who from this chain is that would result in info matching up. The main problem right now seems to be the claim by investigator cc46.
Personally the most likely scenario that I see is that clhong did commit the vig kill but was on someone's priest's lists as a saint, and swapnilg was a sinner. Hence she appeared not guilty for the investigation. If this is what happened and you are the priest, then you would've already lost your role power so please come forward publicly.
_________________ "I intend to live forever or die trying" - Groucho Marx
|