Live Action Mafia

Following the lynch at 8 rather than 10:45 rule we should select who, if anybody, we want to lynch.

Josh

As one of the more anti-no-lynch people, I am fine no-lynching, barring something substantial happening tonight (i.e. a positive investigation)

I would support lynching someone who has not posted an alibi. My preference would be Andres Perez. If he is inactive, it would be nice to get the Medkit somewhere better ASAP.

Even more importantly, we need to elect a police officer. I'll be back on campus before 10 and can get my petition finished then. What's more important though is that SOMEBODY gets elected police officer.

Don't vote for Andres, he's claimed to be Lily's gay knight (though he needs to offload the Medkit ASAP if he hasn't yet). I say vote for Austin Fathman (he's next on the list with no alibi), or else no lynch.

Andres Perez is our lynch suggestion. Andres Erbsen (aka Random Andres) is the one saying he is Lily's gay knight.

Be careful - there are two people named Andres. Andres Erbsen (andres) claimed gay knight, while Andres Perez (anpere) is the one proposed for lynching.

Let me personally warn Andres Perez before we lynch him - he's a first time player and he'd be really sad and never play again if lynched on the first day.

I'm sorry. Ignore my previous post. Let's lynch Andres Perez if he doesn't post by 11. Thanks for offering to warn him, Ellena.

Guys please don't kill me
I am aware my medkit would be better off in the hands of somebody else,
give me a chance to transfer the kit to somebody more worthy.

I am returning to campus now. I can stop by any place that is convenient to get my police officer petition signed.

So . . . everyone has some sort of alibi now. Are we going to not lynch anyone, or decide whose alibi is the least believable?

We should pick a random lynch target from the people with bad alibis. We should NOT no-lynch.

For out-f-game reasons I prefer that we pick a non-first-time-player.

Unless there are any updates I'm voting for qql.

Also voting for qql barring any new evidence.

What is the motivation behind voting for qql? Is there any reasoning?

qql has a mediocre alibi and [s]the no-No Lynch mob will kill us all if we don't[/s] it's good to have a random lynch so people can't get away with bad alibis.

I would be in favor of voting for isaacg. I'm not sure I trust the np vouching for him

Is her "in lecture" alibi any weaker than anyone else's "in lecture" alibi? Also, this means we're punishing people for not conveniently being in a provably innocent place... Mafia can easily ask other mafia to vouch for their fake alibis, but townspeople can't. (I'm currently part of the "no lynch" crowd, but I'm willing to change ideologies for good enough justification)

We should lynch someone, on general principles: if we do lynch, we might hit a mafia; if not, the next kill is guaranteed to be of someone innocent. (Also, inactive people hardly help.)

I'm voting for isaacg, because if qql gets proven innocent in the next few minutes I won't be around to change my vote, and it sounds like he's the second choice. (Either of them seems basically random, though.)